PSP Bibliography




Notice:

  • Clicking on the DOI link will open a new window with the original bibliographic entry from the publisher.
  • Clicking on a single author will show all publications by the selected author.
  • Clicking on a single keyword, will show all publications by the selected keyword.





Editorial: Topical Volume on Developing the Solar Probe Plus Mission



AuthorFox, Nicola; McComas, David;
KeywordsParker Data Used; parker solar probe; Solar Probe Plus
Abstract

The Solar Probe Plus mission is a remarkable and historic step in the exploration of humankind. We have visited all of the planets and a number of other smaller moons and bodies; we have explored the magnetospheres, not just of Earth but also of all the planets; and we have explored our heliosphere and even flown a spacecraft beyond its boundary and into interstellar space itself. However, only with the launch of Solar Probe Plus will we actually visit our own star\textemdashthe Sun\textemdashrepeatedly traveling to within 9 solar radii (R\ S\ \ RS ) of its surface (10R\ S\ \ 10RS heliocentric) and directly through its corona. From here, we will at long last be able to solve the key mysteries that have puzzled scientists for over 50 years: how the corona is heated and how the solar wind and solar energetic particles are accelerated.

The call for a \textquotedblleftSolar Probe\textquotedblright to directly sample the near-Sun environment began at the start of the space age. Just a few months after NASA was founded in July 1958, the National Research Council (NRC) Space Studies Board\textquoterights Physics of Particles and Fields in Space Committee (Chaired by John Simpson) issued an interim report with recommendations for future NASA missions. These included a spacecraft to study the particles and fields environments near the Sun. Since then NASA conducted numerous studies with various Science and Technology Definition Teams (STDTs).

In 2003, after many decades of NRC Decadal Surveys, NASA studies, and STDT reports, The Sun to the Earth\textemdashand Beyond. A\ Decadal Research Strategy in Solar and Space Physics, NRC, National Academy Press, was published in 2003, stressing the critical science of such a mission and recommending its \textquotedblleftimplementation as soon as possible.\textquotedblright This led to the formation of a new STDT that culminated in its 2005 report\textemdashSolar Probe: Report of the Science and Technology Definition Team, NASA/TM-2005-212786. That Solar Probe mission design was similar to many prior designs with the probe first needing to travel out to Jupiter for a gravitational assist that would throw it into a solar polar orbit that would zip past the Sun, reaching 4R\ S\ \ 4RS of the Sun\textquoterights center for one or two orbits. This mission was costly and relied on Radioisotope Thermal Generators (RTGs) for power.

After some time for consideration, NASA convened the same STDT and challenged them to find a better and cheaper way to accomplish the same science goals. This led to a completely new mission design and the final 2008 STDT report\textemdashSolar Probe Plus: Report of the Science and Technology Definition Team, NASA/TM-2008-214161. The new mission design launches inward not outward and uses seven Venus flybys to step its 24 ecliptic orbits down from a perihelion of 35R\ S\ \ 35RS in its first orbit (roughly twice as close to the Sun as any prior spacecraft) to under 10R\ S\ \ 10RS for the final three orbits. Remarkably, this new mission was less than half the cost of the prior design and, with its many solar flybys, it was actually scientific superior\textellipsis hence the name Solar Probe Plus (SPP).

NASA began funding some pre-Phase A technology development to \textquotedblleftbuy down\textquotedblright implementation risk at the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (APL) that had conducted the engineering work for the final STDT reports and which was designated by NASA to be the mission implementing organization. Then, in late 2009, NASA released an Announcement of Opportunity that led to the selection of four science investigations described in this topical volume.

This topical volume comprises five papers that describe the SPP science, instruments, and mission as it is being developed, between the Mission Preliminary Design Review (PDR) in January 2014 and the Mission Critical Design Review (CDR) in March 2015. The volume provides the basis for the broader Heliophysics community to understand and prepare for the SPP mission and the incredible new and discovery science that will come from it. We sincerely hope that future researchers, authors and students will use this information to help in their studies. Paper 1 (Fox et al.) provides an overview of the entire SPP program including the SPP science, hardware, and mission. Paper 2 describes the Fields Investigation for Solar Probe Plus (FIELDS) (Bale et al.), Paper 3 the Wide-field Imager (WISPR) investigation (Vourlidas et al.), Paper 4 the Solar Wind Electrons Alphas and Protons Investigation (SWEAP) (Kasper et al.), and Paper 5 the Integrated Science Investigation of the Sun (Open image in new window ) energetic particle investigation (McComas et al). We note that the prior acronym\textemdashISIS\textemdashthat is used throughout the papers in this volume has now been formally changed to Open image in new window (pronounced as in the original Egyptian \textquotedblleftEE-sihs\textquotedblright).

More than just a transformational science mission, SPP has captured the hearts and minds of people the world over\textemdashinspiring students to become scientists and engineers and showing that no challenge is too daunting. The truly outstanding team of people who are making the SPP mission such a great success includes countless scientists and engineers worldwide who have never ceased in their efforts to make this mission a reality; this volume is dedicated to every one of them with our sincerest thanks!

Year of Publication2016
JournalSpace Science Reviews
Volume204
Number of Pages1-6
Section
Date Published12/2016
ISBN
URLhttp://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11214-016-0323-7
DOI10.1007/s11214-016-0323-7